Questions 21 to 25 are based on the following passage:
There are good reasons to be troubled by the violence that
spreads throughout the media. Movies, television and video games
are full of gunplay and bloodshed, and one might reasonably ask
what’s wrong with a society that presents videos of domestic
violence as entertainment.
Most researchers agree that the
causes of real-world violence are complex. A 1993 study by the
U.S. National Academy of Sciences listed “biological,
individual, family, peer, school, and community factors” as all
playing their parts.
Viewing abnormally large amounts of violent television and
video games may well contribute to violent behavior in certain
individuals. The trouble comes when researchers downplay
uncertainties in their studies or overstate the case for
causality(因果关系). Skeptics were dismayed several years ago when a
group of societies including the American Medical Association
tried to end the debate by issuing a joint statement: “At this
time, well over 1,000 studies… point overwhelmingly to a causal
connection between media violence and aggressive behavior in
Freedom-of-speech advocates accused the societies of
catering to politicians, and even disputed the number of studies
(most were review articles and essays, they said). When Jonathan
Freedman, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto,
reviewed the literature, he found only 200 or so studies of
television-watching and aggression. And when he weeded out “the
most doubtful measures of aggression”, only 28% supported a
The critical point here is causality. The alarmists say
they have proved that violent media cause aggression. Butn the
assumptions behind their observations need to be examined. When
labeling games as violent or non-violent, should a hero eating a
ghost really be counted as a violent event? And when
experimenters record the time it takes game players to read
“aggressive” or “non-aggressive” words from a list, can we be
sure what they are actually measuring? The intent of the new
Harvard Center on Media and Child Health to collect and
standardize studies of media violence in order to compare their
methodologies, assumptions and conclusions is an important step
in the right direction.
Another appropriate step would be to tone down the
criticism until we know more. Several researchers write, speak
and testify quite a lot on the threat posed by violence in the
media. That is, of course, their privilege. But when doing so,
they often come out with statements that the matter has now been
settled, drawing criticism from colleagues. In response, the
alarmists accuse critics and news reporters of being deceived by
the entertainment industry. Such clashes help neither science
21. 21. Why is there so much violence shown in movies, TV and video games?
A、 There is a lot of violence in the real world today.
B、Something has gone wrong with today’s society
C、Many people are fond of gunplay and bloodshed.
D、Showing violence is thought to be entertaining.
22. 22.What is the skeptics’ ( Line 3, Para. 3 ) view of media violence?
A、Violence on television is fairly accurate reflection of real-world life.
B、Most studies exaggerate the effect of media violence on the viewers.
C、A causal relationship exists between media and real-world violence.
D、The influence of media violence on children has been underestimated.
23. 23.The author uses the term “alarmists” ( Line 1, Para. 5 ) to refer to those who ______.
A、use standardized measurements in the studies of media violence
B、initiated the debate over the influence of violent media on reality
C、assert a direct link between violent media and aggressive behavior
D、use appropriate methodology in examining aggressive behavior
24. 24. In refuting the alarmists, the author advances his argument by first challenging _____.
A、 the source and amount of their data
B、the targets of their observation
C、their system of measurement
D、their definition of violence
25. 25. What does the author think of the debate concerning the relationship between the media and violence?
A、 More studies should be conducted before conclusions are drawn.
B、It should come to an end since the matter has now been settled.
C、The past studies in this field have proved to be misleading
D、 He more than agrees with the views held by the alarmists.
Questions 26 to 30 are based on the following passage:
You’re in trouble if you have to buy your own brand-name
prescription drugs. Over the past decade, prices leaped by more
than double the inflation rate. Treatments for chronic
conditions can easily top $2,000 a month — no wonder that one in
four Americans can’t afford to fill their prescriptions. The
solution? A hearty chorus of “O Canada.” North of the border,
where price controls reign, those same brand-name drugs cost 50%
to 80% less.
The Canadian option is fast becoming a
political wake-up call. “If our neighbors can buy drugs at
reasonable prices, why can’t we?” Even to whisperuyy that
thought provokes anger. “Un-American!” And — the propagandists’
trump card(王牌)— “Wreck our brilliant health-care system.”
Supersize drug prices, they claim, fund the research that sparks
the next generation of wonder drugs. No sky-high drug price
today, no cure for cancer tomorrow. So shut up and pay up.
Common sense tells you that’s a false alternative. The
reward for finding, say, a cancer cure is so huge that no one’s
going to hang it up. Nevertheless, if Canada-level pricing came
to the United States, the industry’s profit margins would drop
and the pace of new-drug development would slow. Here lies the
American dilemma. Who is all this splendid medicine for? Should
our healthcare system continue its drive toward the best of the
best, even though rising numbers of patients can’t afford it? Or
should we direct our wealth toward letting everyone in on
today’s level of care? Measured by saved lives, the latter is
almost certainly the better course.
To defend their profits, the drug companies have warned
Canadian wholesalers and pharmacies(药房)not to sell to Americans
by mail, and are cutting back supplies to those who dare.
Meanwhile, the administration is playing the fear card.
Officials from the Food and Drug Administration will argue that
Canadian drugs might be fake, mishandled, or even a potential
threat to life.
Do bad drugs fly around the Internet? Sure — and the more
we look, the more we’ll find. But I haven’t heard of any raging
epidemics among the hundreds of thousands of people buying
Most users of prescription drugs don’t worry about costs a
lot. They’re sheltered by employee insurance, owing just a $ 20
co-pay. The financial blows rain, instead, on the uninsured,
especially the chronically ill who need expensive drugs to live.
This group will still include middle-income seniors on Medicare,
who’ll have to dig deeply into their pockets before getting much
from the new drug benefit that starts in 2006.
26. 26. What is said about the consequence of the rocketing drug prices in the U.S.?
A、 A quarter of Americans can’t afford their prescription drugs.
B、Many Americans can’t afford to see a doctor when they fall ill.
C、Many Americans have to go to Canada to get medical treatment.
D、The inflation rate has been more than doubled over the years.
27. 27. It can be inferred that America can follow the Canadian model and curb its soaring drug prices by _______.
A、encouraging people to buy prescription drugs online
B、extending medical insurance to all its citizens
C、importing low-price prescription drugs from Canada
D、exercising price control on brand-name drugs
28. 28. How do propagandists argue for the U.S. drug pricing policy?
A、 Low prices will affect the quality of medicines in America.
B、High prices are essential to funding research on new drugs.
C、Low prices will bring about the anger of drug manufacturers
D、High-price drugs are indispensable in curing chronic diseases.
29. 29. What should be the priority of America’s health-care system according to the author?
A、 To resolve the dilemma in the health-care system.
B、To maintain America’s lead in the drug industry.
C、To allow the vast majority to enjoy its benefits.
D、To quicken the pace of new drug development
30. 30. What are American drug companies doing to protect their high profits?
A、Labeling drugs bought from Canada as being research.
B、Threatening to cut back funding for new drug research
C、Reducing supplies to uncooperative Canadian pharmacies
D、Attributing the raging epidemics to the ineffectiveness of Canadian drugs.
Questions 31 to 35 are based on the following passage:
Age has its privileges in America, and one of the more prominent
of them is the senior citizen discount. Anyone who has reached a
certain age — in some cases as low as 55 — is automatically
entitled to dazzling array of price reductions at nearly every
level of commercial life. Eligibility is determined not by one’s
need but by the date on one’s birth certificate. Practically
unheard of a generation ago, the discounts have become a routine
part of many businesses — as common as color televisions in
motel rooms and free coffee on airliners.
People with gray
hair often are given the discounts without even asking for them;
yet, millions of Americans above age 60 are healthy and
solvent(有支付能力的). Businesses that would never dare offer
discounts to college students or anyone under 30 freely offer
them to older Americans. The practice is acceptable because of
the widespread belief that “elderly” and “needy” are
synonymous(同义的). Perhaps that once was true, but today elderly
Americans as a group have a lower poverty rate than the rest of
the population. To be sure, there is economic diversity within
the elderly, and many older Americans are poor. But most of them
It is impossible to determine the impact of the discounts
on individual companies. For many firms, they are a stimulus to
revenue. But in other cases the discounts are given at the
expense, directly or indirectly, of younger Americans. Moreover,
they are a direct irritant in what some politicians and scholars
see as a coming conflict between the generations.
Generational tensions are being fueled by continuing debate
over Social Security benefits, which mostly involves a transfer
of resources from the young to the old. Employment is another
sore point. Buoyed(支持)by laws and court decisions, more and more
older Americans are declining the retirement dinner in favor of
staying on the job — thereby lessening employment and promotion
opportunities for younger workers.
Far from a kind of charity they once were, senior citizen
discounts have become a formidable economic privilege to a group
with millions of members who don’t need them.
It no longer makes sense to treat the elderly as a single
group whose economic needs deserve priority over those of
others. Senior citizen discounts only enhance the myth that
older people can’t take care of themselves and need special
treatment; and they threaten the creation of a new myth, that
the elderly are ungrateful and taking for themselves at the
expense of children and other age groups. Senior citizen
discounts are the essence of the very thing older Americans are
fighting against — discrimination by age.
31. 31. We learn from the first paragraph that _______.
A、 offering senior citizens discounts has become routine commercial practice
B、senior citizen discounts have enabled many old people to live a decent life
C、giving senior citizens discounts has boosted the market for the elderly
D、senior citizens have to show their birth certificates to get a discount
32. 32. What assumption lies behind the practice of senior citizen discounts?
A、Businesses, having made a lot of profits, should do something for society in return.
B、Old people are entitled to special treatment for the contribution they made to society.
C、The elderly, being financially underprivileged, need humane help from society
D、Senior citizen discounts can make up for the inadequacy of the Social Security system.
33. 33. According to some politicians and scholars, senior citizen discounts will _______.
A、make old people even more dependent on society
B、intensify conflicts between the young and the old
C、have adverse financial impact on business companies
D、bring a marked increase in the companies’ revenues
34. 34. How does the author view the Social Security system?
A、It encourages elderly people to retire in time.
B、 It opens up broad career prospects for young people.
C、It benefits the old at the expense of the young.
D、 It should be reinforced by laws and court decisions.
35. 35. Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main argument?
A、Senior citizens should fight hard against age discrimination.
B、The elderly are selfish and taking senior discounts for granted.
C、Priority should be given to the economic needs of senior citizens.
D、Senior citizen discounts may well be a type of age discrimination.
Questions 36 to 40 are based on the following passage:
In 1854 my great-grandfather, Morris Marable,
was sold on an auction block in Georgia for $
500. for his white slave master, the sale was
just “business as usual.” But to Morris Marable
and his heirs, slavery was a crime against our
humanity. This pattern of human rights
violations against enslaved African-Americans
continued under racial segregation for nearly
The fundamental problem of
American democracy in the 21st century is the
problem of “structural racism” : the deep
patterns of socio-economic inequality and
accumulated disadvantage that are coded by race,
and constantly justified in public speeches by
both racist stereotypes and white indifference.
Do Americans have the capacity and vision to
remove these structural barriers that deny
democratic rights and opportunities to millions
of their fellow citizens?
This country has previously witnessed two
great struggles to achieve a truly multicultural
The First Reconstruction(1954-1877)ended
slavery and briefly gave black men voting
rights, but gave no meaningful compensation for
two centuries of unpaid labor. The promise of
“40 acres and a mule(骡子)” was for most blacks a
The Second Reconstruction(1954-1968), or
the modern civil rights movement, ended legal
segregation in public accommodations and gave
blacks voting rights. But these successes
paradoxically obscure the tremendous human costs
of historically accumulated disadvantage that
remain central to black Americans’ lives.
The disproportionate wealth that most
whites enjoy today was first constructed from
centuries of unpaid black labor. Many white
institutions, including some leading
universities, insurance companies and banks,
profited from slavery. This pattern of white
privilege and black inequality continues today.
Demanding reparations(赔偿)is no just about
compensation for slavery and segregation. It is,
more important, an educational campaign to
highlight the contemporary reality of “racial
deficits” of all kinds, the unequal conditions
that impact blacks regardless of class.
Structural racism’s barriers include “equity
inequity,” the absence of black capital
formation that is a direct consequence of
America’s history. One third of all black
households actually have negative net wealth. In
1998 the typical black family’s net wealth was $
16,400 , less than one fifth that of white
families. Black families are denied home loans
at twice the rate of whites.
Blacks remain the last hired and first
fired during recessions. During the 1990-91
recession, African-Americans suffered
disproportionately. At Coca-Cola, 42 percent of
employees who lost their jobs were blacks. At
Sears, 54 percent were black. Black have
significantly shorter life spans, in part due to
racism in the health establishment. Black are
statistically less likely than whites to be
referred for kidney transplants or early-stage
36. 36. To the author, the auction of his great-grandfather is a typical example of _______.
A、crime against humanity
B、unfair business transaction
C、racial conflicts in Georgia
D、racial segregation in America
37. 37. The barrier to democracy in 21st century America is ______.
A、 widespread use of racist stereotypes
B、prejudice against minority groups
C、deep-rooted socio-economic inequality
D、denial of legal rights to ordinary blacks.
38. 38. What problem remains unsolved in the two Reconstructions?
A、Differences between races are deliberately obscured.
B、The blacks are not compensated for their unpaid labor.
C、There is no guarantee for blacks to exercise their rights.
D、The interests of blacks are not protected by law.
39. 39. It is clear that the wealth enjoyed by most whites ________.
A、 has resulted from business successes over the years
B、has been accompanied by black capital formation
C、has derived from sizable investments in education
D、has been accumulated from generations of slavery
40. 40. What does the author think of the current situation regarding racial discrimination?
A、Racism is not a major obstacle to blacks’ employment.
B、Inequality of many kinds remains virtually untouched.
C、A major step has been taken towards reparations.
D、Little has been done to ensure blacks’ civil rights